Above we have a (low resolution) image of Marmorosh's column which was mentioned in the last post. The link is to the original paper, where a high-resolution image can be found. It is a testimony to Marmorosh's dedication to chess that this one column has:
1). A problem (mate in 3)
2). A study (White wins)
3). A game (Vogel - Czerniak, 0-1, Jerusalem championship, 1935)
4). Local news (Jerusalem championship results, upcoming Jerusalem-Tel Aviv match, Ra'anana club founded.)
5). International news (Capablanca wins simultaneous games.)
6). Answers to correspondents.
7). A long lesson for beginners (the goal of the game, the movement of the king, the meaning of 'mate'.)
That said, the definition of 'mate' is somewhat mysterious:
'If the king is attacked on the square it is on and it is surrounded by friends and enemies to such a degree that it has no other square to escape to, and no other defense, it is mated.'
This seems to imply that the king is mated only when surrounded by other pieces, which is in fact rarely the case, and is unclear about what 'other defense' can there be against the attack on the king except for 'a square to escape to'.
No comments:
Post a Comment